The older I become, the more I realize that political opponents merely talk across one another; there is not even the appearance of understanding the other side.
Yesterday I received my monthly union rags. Sigh . . . it is a disspiriting read every month.
The NJEA Reporter ran a piece about NJ Senator Robert Menendez’s address to the union at the local convention.
Menendez lamented cutbacks to public education at the state and local level. He explained that he introduced the Teachers and First Responders Back-to-Work Act in October to address those shortfalls. The legislation would have provide $30 billion, saving approximately 400,000 jobs. The bill was offset by a 0.5 percent tax on incomes over one million dollars. According to the senator, the measure failed because Republicans in the Senate opposed the tax.
“Think for a moment of what that says about their priorities,” Menendez said. “They want to protect the most fortunate among us from having to pay half a penny on every dollar they make over a million dollars, rather than protect the jobs of 400,000 public employees.”
Here are my problems with Senator Menendez’s position:
1. The US Constitution does not provide for Menendez to tax citizens to provide money to pay teachers. I know that because I read the Constitution. In it, the Tenth Amendment clearly states that if a task (paying teacher salaries, for instance) is not specifically enumerated, it is a right reserved for the states and the people. Neither Menendez or anyone else can craft teacher salaries out of the Constitution.
2. Menendez claims $30 billion would save 400,000 jobs. Since the money was not spent, that must mean that 400,000 public employee jobs were lost. Document them. It is either true or not. Let’s see the data of these lost jobs.
3. I did the math: that’s $75,000 per job. Nice salary.
4. Every proposal out of Washington D.C. wants to spend money on the backs of the millionaires. If money is taken from these folks, they will no longer be millionaires. That aside, the Constitution was written to keep the federal government in check. The original blueprint for this country provided virtually no role for the federal government. Sensing some problems with that, the founders drafted the Constitution. They were fearful of a Senator Menendez of a government that became too powerful and wrote a document to limit the federal government’s role.
NJEA would do much better if it recognized its members would prosper more if the federal government were removed from the equation.